Finally got around to listening to the podcast – during my weekly trip to Århus. I liked the debate. However, you and Rikke seemed to be very much in agreement. Hence, there was too litle genuine debate on this important subject. Still, your ideas regarding discussing these items in a new context (ie: This is not (only) a question on govermental institutions possibly violating our civil rights. It is – more impotantly – a question on what we as persons accepts and do not accept) deserves some continuation. Any comments on how to restart the debate?

/Per